So much from Dallas Willard, I know. But this stuff is so rich. Every time I read a new section, it baffles me. Does it speak to you, too?
“The effects of condemnation remain the same. It remains a stinging attack, a shocking assault upon the one condemned. And it often grows into shame. Shame seems to be the most widespread and deepest among the very people who take rightness and goodness most seriously. It is a dimension of condemnation that reaches into the deepest level of our souls…
If our counterattack is unacceptable to ourselves…it may be shoved beneath the surface and will then come out in the many forms of behavior that look like something else, for example, perfectionism, procrastination, rejection of authority, or passive/aggressive tendencies such as the constant aborting of success… For condemnation brings anger in return, and anger will attack. And this attack can be and often is turned against oneself by the amazing chemistry of the mind…
‘Why do you concentrate on the little speck in your brother’s eye, but do not take into consideration the board in your own eye?’ (Matt. 7:3)
Condemnation is the board in our eye. Jesus knows that the mere fact that we are condemning someone shows our heart does not have the kingdom rightness he has been talking about. Condemnation, especially with its usual accompaniments of anger and contempt and self-righteousness, blinds us to the reality of the other person. We cannot ‘see clearly’ how to assist our brother, because we cannot see our brother. And we will never know how to truly help him until we have grown into the kind of person who does not condemn. Period.
But some are troubled with giving up ‘judging’ because of another sense of the word that marks an absolutely central aspect of life, one that Jesus is in no way suggesting we omit. The term krino, a form of which Jesus uses here in Matthew 7, has as its primary meanings ‘to separate, make a distinction between, exercise judgment upon,’ ‘to estimate or appraise.’
For example, a dentist may examine a patient’s teeth and say, ‘I see you have not been brushing regularly. Your gums are receding, and there is a cavity over on this right lower side.’ When he does this, he is indeed judging the condition of the patient’s teeth and gums and practice of dental hygiene. He is discerning, seeing and saying what it is.
We do not have to – we cannot – surrender the valid practice of distinguishing and discerning how things are in order to avoid condemning others. We can, however, train ourselves to hold people responsible and discuss their failures with them – and even assign them penalties, if we are, for example, in some position over them – without attacking their worth as human beings or marking them as rejects. A practiced spirit of intelligent agape will make this possible.”
A Divine Conspiracy, pgs. 222, 223, 224, 225
Oh my word. Soul searching is necessary. And thank you, God, that I can think of several examples in my life who discern without condemning. Make me one of them.